Skip to main content

COQUI MALACHOWSKA COQUI

Zoliborz_Icon

GARDEN CITY ZOLIBORZ OFICERSKI

Revi­ta­liza­ti­on of public spaces

Loca­ti­on: War­saw, Pol­and
Cli­ent: City of War­saw, Dis­trict Zoli­borz
Year: 2007
Ser­vice pha­ses: Pre­pa­ra­ti­on and Brief, Con­cept Design, Deve­lo­ped Design (HOAI 1–3)
Archi­tec­tu­re: Czu­ba Lato­szek sp. z o.o., War­saw
Coope­ra­ti­on: Dr. Bren­ner & Mün­nich Inge­nieur­ge­sell­schaft mbH (con­sul­tant for road plan­ning), mgr. inz. arch. Maria Sol­tys (con­sul­tant for heri­ta­ge con­ser­va­ti­on)

The con­cept for the revi­ta­li­sa­ti­on of public spaces in the gar­den city of Żoli­borz Ofi­cer­ski in War­saw is based on the con­ti­nua­tion of his­to­ri­cal urban plan­ning prin­ci­ples. The aim is to streng­then spa­ti­al struc­tures, ensu­re the func­tion­al dif­fe­ren­tia­ti­on of streets, squa­res and green spaces, and achie­ve high-qua­li­ty design through the use of vege­ta­ti­on, mate­ri­als and street fur­ni­tu­re, whilst taking social and aes­the­tic aspects into account.

Zoliborz_Plan_GR_03
Zoliborz_Plan_GR_02
Zoliborz_Plan_GR_01
4a

I. SPA­TI­AL PLAN­NING – THE PRIN­CI­PLE OF CON­TI­NUI­TY AND ADHE­RENCE TO URBAN PLAN­NING PRIN­CI­PLES

The prin­ci­ples of the revi­ta­li­sa­ti­on con­cept are based on the his­to­ri­cal deve­lo­p­ment of the estate, who­se ori­gi­nal design (by archi­tect Tołłocz­ko) is cha­rac­te­ri­sed by out­stan­ding urban plan­ning. The­se are:

A con­ti­nua­tion of the con­text of ‘old’ Żoli­borz, whe­re the inter­faces with ‘civil ser­vants’ Żoli­borz and ‘jour­na­lists’ Żoli­borz are desi­gned in the form of tran­si­ti­ons by empha­sis­ing ele­ments such as small squa­res, lar­ge town squa­res, nar­row pas­sa­ges and urban ‘ope­nings’ on the edge of the estate, achie­ved by means of a set-back buil­ding line.

High­light­ing access points to the street and junc­tions by set­ting back the buil­dings from the buil­ding line, which is deli­bera­te­ly empha­sis­ed by ele­ments desi­gned to struc­tu­re the public space.

Sha­ping the street envi­ron­ment by exten­ding the building’s recess from the buil­ding line to the appearance of the street envi­ron­ment, wher­eby the­se qua­li­ties of the urban lay­out are empha­sis­ed through the high­light­ing (rede­sign) of its ele­ments and are based on a clear demons­tra­ti­on of the diver­si­ty in the spa­ti­al design of this area.

Ele­ments that struc­tu­re public spaces in accordance with the prin­ci­ples set out abo­ve include trees, shrubs, lawns and are­as whe­re cars are park­ed.

The reces­ses in the building’s faça­de are the smal­lest unit of the urban design con­cept and, like the reces­ses of enti­re buil­dings set back from the buil­ding line, are high­ligh­ted in the public space.

The exis­ting axes and sight­li­nes will be res­to­red by felling indi­vi­du­al trees, stan­dar­di­sing the appearance of the foot­paths – which act as line­ar ele­ments of the axes – and intro­du­cing one-sided par­king bays (rede­ve­lo­p­ment).

Zoliborz_UL3_S
Zoliborz_UL3_F
Zoliborz_Konzept_Freiraum_01
Zoliborz_Konzept_Freiraum_02
Zoliborz_Konzept_Parken
Zoliborz_Konzept_Verkehr

II. DEFI­NI­TI­ON OF THE DETAIL­ED URBAN DEVE­LO­P­MENT PRO­GRAM­ME

Depen­ding on their func­tion, three basic types of public spaces can be distin­gu­is­hed, within which, in turn, indi­vi­du­al forms can be iden­ti­fied. The­se are:

ROADS

  • Local shop­ping streets with traf­fic from visi­tors, which ser­ve as a repre­sen­ta­ti­ve part of the housing estate, offer shop­ping faci­li­ties and act as a mee­ting place
  • Resi­den­ti­al streets – a place for living and whe­re resi­dents feel a sen­se of belon­ging, for walks and, whe­re appli­ca­ble, lei­su­re acti­vi­ties, as well as pro­vi­ding trans­port links within the housing estate
  • Inter­nal roads – pede­stri­an and vehic­le rou­tes – a place of resi­dence and a source of iden­ti­ty for resi­dents, offe­ring oppor­tu­ni­ties for mul­ti­func­tion­al use, par­ti­cu­lar­ly by resi­dents of the imme­dia­te neigh­bour­hood (play and sport, socia­li­sing, lei­su­re acti­vi­ties and other pur­po­ses, e.g. repairs, car washing).

 

SQUA­RES

  • Access area to the site – ser­ves to faci­li­ta­te traf­fic flow within the site, aid way­fin­ding and ful­fil repre­sen­ta­tio­nal pur­po­ses;
  • Road widenings in the form of small squa­res – ser­ve to aid way­fin­ding and fos­ter a sen­se of iden­ti­ty, enable social inter­ac­tion and pro­mo­te a sen­se of com­mu­ni­ty within the resi­den­ti­al neigh­bour­hood, and pro­vi­de a space for young peo­p­le to play and socia­li­se
  • Resi­den­ti­al squa­res – a wide ran­ge of ser­vices – out­door dining, recrea­tio­nal faci­li­ties
  • Sports and lei­su­re spaces – acti­vi­ties for users aged 10–18, mul­ti­func­tion­al use in the form of a cover­ed com­mu­nal area, sport, lei­su­re, with the pos­si­bi­li­ty of orga­ni­s­ing con­certs, pic­nics and local com­mu­ni­ty gathe­rings
  • Spaces with a deco­ra­ti­ve cha­rac­ter – a semi-public, deco­ra­ti­ve space used by resi­dents.

 

URBAN GAR­DENS

  • Urban gar­dens – spaces with mul­ti­ple uses (play are­as for young child­ren, recrea­ti­on, social gathe­rings, eco­lo­gi­cal­ly signi­fi­cant are­as within the city, as well as places that ‘enhan­ce’ public spaces and com­ple­ment pri­va­te open spaces
  • The gar­den by the libra­ry – a space for a varie­ty of uses (play­ground for young child­ren, recrea­ti­on, social gathe­rings, eco­lo­gi­cal­ly signi­fi­cant are­as within the city, as well as spaces that ‘enhan­ce’ public spaces and also com­pen­sa­te for the lack of pri­va­te open spaces).
Zoliborz_UL1_F
Zoliborz_UL1_S

III. URBAN DESIGN OF STREET SPACES

Prin­ci­ples:

  • Cla­ri­fi­ca­ti­on of owner­ship arran­ge­ments, taking into account urban plan­ning requi­re­ments and the prin­ci­ples of land­scape archi­tec­tu­re
  • Rem­oval of bar­riers for peo­p­le with disa­bi­li­ties
  • Intro­duc­tion of a sys­te­ma­tic tree manage­ment pro­gram­me based on an inven­to­ry and assess­ment of the tree popu­la­ti­on
  • Estab­lish­ment of requi­re­ments for tree manage­ment on pri­va­te land
  • Orga­ni­sa­ti­on and res­to­ra­ti­on in accordance with the his­to­ri­cal prin­ci­ples of low-level plan­ting design
  • Coor­di­na­ti­on regar­ding street fur­ni­tu­re, paving and fix­tures (inclu­ding light­ing, ben­ches, lamp­posts, lit­ter bins, bol­lards, gas con­nec­tion boxes and man­ho­le covers).
2a
01aSN
01aGR
10_SN_KL
10_GR
04bSN
04bGR

IV. PLANT WORLD

CON­CEPT FOR THE TREE STOCK

Prin­ci­ples:

A distinc­tion is made bet­ween three fun­da­men­tal are­as in which the design of public space is diver­se and is empha­sis­ed by the type of plan­ting. This clas­si­fi­ca­ti­on is based on the degree to which the urban struc­tu­re has been pre­ser­ved (its authen­ti­ci­ty) in rela­ti­on to archi­tect Tołłoczko’s plan. The­se are:

HIS­TO­RIC AREA WHO­SE FORM HAS REMAIN­ED LAR­GE­LY UNCH­AN­GED

The inte­ri­ors, which have been pre­ser­ved in their ori­gi­nal form, will not be alte­red.

Type A: ‘HALL’ (Czar­nieckie­go Street, sou­thern sec­tion of Kra­sińs­kie­go Street, the squa­re behind Fort Sokol­ni­cki)

Objec­ti­ves: to enhan­ce the spa­ti­al struc­tu­re through the addi­ti­on of scat­te­red trees.

Type B: ‘COR­RI­DOR – SALONS’ (Śmi­ała Street to the libra­ry, inclu­ding Słonecz­ny Squa­re)

Objec­ti­ves: to enhan­ce or reve­al the spa­ti­al struc­tu­re through plan­ting or the sel­ec­ti­ve rem­oval of trees.

Type C: “CABI­NETS” (Kaniows­ka Street – nor­t­hern sec­tion, For­tecz­na Street – eas­tern sec­tion, Hau­ke-Bosa­ka Street – eas­tern sec­tion, Mierosław­skie­go Street – wes­tern sec­tion)

Objec­ti­ves: to enhan­ce or reve­al the spa­ti­al struc­tu­re through new plan­ting or the sel­ec­ti­ve rem­oval of trees.

PAR­TI­AL­LY REDE­SI­GNED ARE­AS

The inte­ri­or are­as, which have been par­ti­al­ly alte­red com­pared with their ori­gi­nal form, are sepa­ra­ted from the his­to­ric inte­ri­or are­as by rows of trees, whilst at the same time enhan­cing their aes­the­tic appeal. What is important here is the empha­sis on a reco­g­nisable and modi­fied spa­ti­al inte­ri­or design.

Type E: ‘ZIM­MER’ (Kaniows­ka Street, eas­tern sec­tion; Mierosław­skie­go Street, eas­tern sec­tion)

Objec­ti­ves: Plan­ting rows of small trees that fol­low the for­mer boun­da­ry of the sett­le­ment on the side of the citadel’s fore­court

Type C: ‘KABI­NET­TE’ (wes­tern sec­tion of For­tecz­na Street)

Objec­ti­ves: Plan­ting rows of small trees model­led on the form­er­ly unde­ve­lo­ped gar­dens in the nor­t­hern part of the street

Type C: ‘KABI­NET­TE’ (Hau­ke-Bos­sa­ka Street, wes­tern sec­tion)

Objec­ti­ves: Plan­ting rows of small trees in the same way as on the south side of the street

Type C: ‘KABI­NET­TE’ (cen­tral and eas­tern sec­tions of Mierosław­skie­go Street)

Objec­ti­ves: Plan­ting rows of small trees in kee­ping with the form­er­ly unde­ve­lo­ped gar­dens in the nor­t­hern part of the street.

ARE­AS THAT HAVE BEEN LAR­GE­LY REDE­SI­GNED OR ARE ENTI­RE­LY NEW

Modern land­sca­ping tech­ni­ques are used in this area.

Type A: ‘SALON’ (Śmi­ała Street, from the resi­den­ti­al squa­re by the libra­ry to the squa­re on Gen. Zającz­ka Street)

Objec­ti­ves: To crea­te a paved squa­re incor­po­ra­ting exis­ting trees within the squa­re.

Type E: ‘ZAPIE­CEK’ (Mun­ka Street, Jakie­la Street, Sza­niaw­skie­go Street, Ejs­mon­da Street)

Objec­ti­ves: In this area, modern plan­ting sche­mes will be imple­men­ted in the form of irre­gu­lar indi­vi­du­al plan­tings and plan­ting beds.

CON­CEPT FOR LOW PLAN­TING

Along the streets in his­to­ric are­as, low-gro­wing vege­ta­ti­on is being res­to­red whe­re it ori­gi­nal­ly exis­ted. Plan­ting in the ver­ges is limi­t­ed to lawns, cree­ping plants or low and medi­um-height shrubs. The use of low-gro­wing plants empha­si­s­es the rhythm of the street (hedges, lawns, ground cover). The ver­ges are pro­tec­ted by low edging.

Zoliborz_Plan_Belaege
Zoliborz_UL2_F
Zoliborz_UL2_S

V. SUR­FACES

Prin­ci­ples:

  • The con­cept for sel­ec­ting the paving mate­ri­als is based on the prin­ci­ple that the pave­ments should be desi­gned to be cost-effec­ti­ve in terms of sur­face area, whilst their edging requi­res a hig­her level of invest­ment.
  • Light grey sur­fa­cing is pro­po­sed for the car­ri­a­ge­way and foot­paths, which is coor­di­na­ted with the colour sche­me of the faça­des and the urban design descri­bed by archi­tect K. Tołłoc­zek as ‘varied and free’.
  • The car­ri­a­ge­way con­sists of coar­se-grai­ned asphalt with a sur­face of light grey chip­pings, whilst the pave­ments are paved with 35 x 35 cm slabs of sand­blas­ted con­cre­te in light grey and edged with medi­um-sized red gra­ni­te paving stones.
  • The kerbs of the pave­ments and green strips are made of grey con­cre­te (matching the colour of the slabs).
  • The dri­ve­ways con­sist of exis­ting natu­ral paving stones made of red gra­ni­te and basalt, mea­su­ring 10–16 x 16–27 mm; the dri­ve­way edging is made of the same mate­ri­al.
  • The crossings con­sist of grey con­cre­te slabs mea­su­ring 35 x 35 cm, edged with medi­um-sized red gra­ni­te paving stones.
  • The car­ri­a­ge­ways are edged with a red gra­ni­te kerb mea­su­ring 100 x 20 cm (mate­ri­al as alre­a­dy pre­sent on site).
  • The drai­na­ge chan­nel will be con­s­truc­ted using the exis­ting car­ri­a­ge­way kerbs (red gra­ni­te).
3
5a
08bSN
08aGR
06aSN
06aGR

VI. FUR­NI­TU­RE

The ori­gi­nal con­cept for the housing estate is based on the absence of street fur­ni­tu­re in public spaces. For this reason, the use of modern street fur­ni­tu­re seems jus­ti­fied. This will be adapt­ed to the style of the exis­ting archi­tec­tu­re, the exis­ting street lamps and the cha­rac­ter of the gar­den city – in the form of black metal ele­ments com­bi­ned with wood.

BEN­CHES

This type of street fur­ni­tu­re is found exclu­si­ve­ly in squa­res and green spaces. Small squa­res, such as tho­se at junc­tions, are fur­nis­hed with sea­ting in the form of a group of seve­ral arm­chairs. Bicy­cle racks are loca­ted in squa­res and green spaces, at pri­va­te and public ser­vice estab­lish­ments, and in the front gar­dens of hou­ses.

LIGHT­ING

  • In the nor­t­hern sec­tion – pas­to­ral-style lan­terns as street light­ing
  • Resi­den­ti­al sec­tions of for­mer farm tracks – ‘Ebro’ street lamps manu­fac­tu­red by Hess
  • At spe­ci­fic loca­ti­ons – addi­tio­nal use of ground-moun­ted spot­lights.

 

In light of the posi­ti­ve expe­ri­en­ces in other Euro­pean cities, it is pro­po­sed that we refrain from instal­ling RUB­BISH BINS, as the­se incur high main­ten­an­ce cos­ts and, when over­fil­led, look unsight­ly and cau­se odours.

1a

Kontakt

KONTAKT

BERLIN